Sunday, July 24, 2011

people of walmart

images Weird People From Walmart people of walmart. people of walmart unrelated to walmart customers time in freeport kan
  • people of walmart unrelated to walmart customers time in freeport kan



  • shantanup
    10-28 01:44 PM
    Finally, notarized and faxed the letter today.





    wallpaper people of walmart unrelated to walmart customers time in freeport kan people of walmart. People of Walmart Truly Unique
  • People of Walmart Truly Unique



  • qesehmk
    02-08 08:24 PM
    Frankly I think that this lawyer is just posting provocative material to make himself popular. He has made many predictions and number of "useful" analysis in the past, most of which were found to be untrue. I used to read his posts until recently I figured out that the analysis was unreliable. This is just my opinion.

    I am tempted to think the same way ... although I am not sure.

    By the way .... I don't understand the difference between unused and wasted. If I am not wrong, waste happens when a) visa number is issued and is never used in a fiscal year. b) visa numbers are available but USCIS isn't able to produce enough demand.





    people of walmart. Lady Gaga People of Walmart
  • Lady Gaga People of Walmart



  • maddipati1
    07-11 10:12 PM
    the current 485 processing dates for both NSC and TSC are in July'07.

    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC

    which means, processing of all the 485's with a PD before July'07 are completed and ready to be assigned a visa number.

    and now VISA numbers are available.

    also, i heard abt namecheck ruling, they will give u GC even if ur 485 is stuck in namecheck, which was worst way of getting stuck for lot of guys.

    so, every EB2-I with a PD before 01JUN06 will get a GC shortly.

    140 pending, RFE, clerical error cases are exception to this.
    these guys will definetely get GC in OCT'08.

    surely they will make EB2-I unavailable in next month, coz, there are no more VISA #s available for this year,

    but in OCT they will resume from 01JUN06 minus 'the guys whose PD is before 01JUN06 and their application processing is completed (140 approved, satisfied RFE etc ) '

    it looks all good for EB2-I guys have fun.





    2011 People of Walmart Truly Unique people of walmart. Image: People of Walmart part
  • Image: People of Walmart part



  • kate123
    02-04 11:28 AM
    well said.

    Some questions to those who are supporting country cap.

    Why not put a country cap on foreign students’ visas since many of them get into the green card line eventually?
    Why not put a country cap on H1B visas since many of them get into the green card line eventually?
    Why not put a country cap on labor certifications?
    Why not put a country cap on I-140s?
    Why not impose a country cap at the port of entry?
    Why not put a country cap on visitors’ visas?
    Why not put a country cap on business visas?
    Why not put a country cap on US trade with other countries?
    Why not put a country cap on amount of US $ reserves that each country can have?
    Why not put a country cap on children that foreigners in the US can bear?
    Why not put a country cap on the foreigners’ earnings in the US?
    .
    .
    .
    And the list can go on.

    Putting country cap on greens cards serves a hidden racist agenda of not letting the people of one particular ethnic group grow in number and become strong.



    more...


    people of walmart. People of Walmart
  • People of Walmart



  • willigetgc?
    08-10 10:30 PM
    i feel frustrated at some peoples' unwillingness to admit that eb3 needs iv's help now more than ever. They are saying that nothing much can be done for eb3, as ins merely corrected its wrong interpretation in visa allocation

    I went to the advocacy days in DC this June, and the biggest push IV was/is making - country cap elimination. The biggest benefactor of this change is EB3 (eb2 will be helped too, but that is how INS preference system works) - again, the biggest benefactor of this legislative change is eb3. IV has been pushing this issue over and over - try reaching out about town hall meetings or any such meetings with lawmakers - and you will figure out how much iv is working on behalf of eb3. Unfortunately, not many eb3 were active until the last 2 vbs. So, please do not say, "nothing much can be done for eb3" or "IV is not working for EB3". Its just that you may not see value in the route that IV is pursuing. It is eb3 members' unwillingness to admit that IV needs grass root help more than ever now.

    but, if we are all willing to put our hearts and minds to it we can surely come up with new ideas that will help our cause. Surely, laws are written so that justice can happen. So if justice is not happening, the law would have some answer, somewhere.

    Let me put forward my idea.

    The ina language says that until eb2 is not current, there will be no spillover to eb3. Agreed. but i would contend that this statement is on a year to year basis. that is, if in the year 2002 (for example) all eb2 has been satisfied, then the spillovers should go to year 2002 eb3.

    i am sorry to point this out, but you are looking at this from only your angle. Don't get me wrong, i would probably do the same. Having said that, logically this change will not fly with the uscis - 2 reasons - 1. Your contention that this rule is year to year - flawed contention 2. What does all eb2 satisfied mean? - these arguments will not work. I am not pulling you or the idea down - but simply stating my point of view based on what I know of the law.

    is this something iv can point out and fight for? Can eb3 members put their money and efforts in this direction? Let me know if this sounds worthwhile

    now a days we are seeing more threads related to spill over allocation interpretation etc, but i have not seen any single post by iv core about this. I am from eb3 community and share the frustration among others.

    i remember a time just a few months ago this year, eb2 were complaining about spillover not happening, and iv core disputed it, saying that spillover was happening.

    i see a lot of people suggesting to port from eb3 to eb2, instead of wasting time on these discussions. Well, porting is not an option for most of us. It is either because we are working for big companies (who do not want to extra burden) or not able to find a small company which can help us.

    just like you are seeing the ground realities of porting from eb3 to eb2, i believe that iv knows the ground reality of proposing new interpretations to the law. I would go a little further in saying that the proposals considered here are changes in the law than changes in the interpretation of the law.


    I may be wrong on my thinking, but I do hope you take a suggestion - when reading the INS law, understand it independently first. Then go back to see, if it can be applied on your interpretation. Do not start out with it, everything looks red when wearing red tinted glasses.......

    After the advocacy days in DC, I am sold on what IV is offering and its commitment to the EB community. I am EB3 too and I am pretty much in the same boat as many of you here.





    people of walmart. People of Walmart – Part 1
  • People of Walmart – Part 1



  • Legal
    07-13 04:49 PM
    If they can approve ~ 150 k total EB cases per year @ ~12,500 / month, with EB3 used up for the remainder of this year, they can definitely process at least 25 k during Aug and Sep.

    They adjudicated lot more 485s than 25 K last year. This massive adjudication was the reason behind threatened withdrawal of July 07 bulletin.



    more...


    people of walmart. funny people of walmart.
  • funny people of walmart.



  • gimme_GC2006
    04-06 06:18 PM
    Sure I will give the link..

    I know its not fake..because I have 3 people on our floor who came from a visit..who saw these kind of things happening right in front of them (and my friends were GCs so I guess they themselves were left alone).

    Now coming to point of posting their experiences themselves..especially in a situation where they were not allowed to enter US, I dont think they have any incentive left to post and seek help from fellow IV..once they are out they are out..

    Nothing can bring them back unless they file a new petition and go for stamping..

    I can imagine how much pain they might be going through, touchwood if I was to be one ofthem, I dont see myself posting my experience for 3 months or so..

    its a different case where someone is inside US and they face a problem, yeah..why not they post straight away, but this is a different territory..we can only expect them to post, its not going to happen or may be rare case.





    2010 Lady Gaga People of Walmart people of walmart. Weird People From Walmart
  • Weird People From Walmart



  • varshadas
    12-19 09:26 AM
    Conference Details

    Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2006
    Start Time: 9:00 PM Eastern Std Time
    End Time: 10:55 PM Eastern Std Time
    Participants: 25
    Type of Conference Web-Scheduled Standard
    Dial-in Number: 1-605-725-1900 (South Dakota)
    Organizer Access Code: *938581 (you must include the leading star key)
    Participant Access Code 22558



    more...


    people of walmart. People of Walmart website,
  • People of Walmart website,



  • andycool
    02-11 11:50 AM
    141,020 visa numbers used in FY2009
    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY09AnnualReport_TableV.pdf

    Look at the last page.

    The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is 140,000. So the usage was actually more.



    __________________
    Not a legal advice.


    Check this link

    Report of the Visa Office 2009 Table of Contents (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_4594.html)

    Point V and part 2

    the numbers come around 137000 ( which is 3000 ) Short of 140,000 ( I think the actual number will be 140,000 + Spill over FB Visas from 2008 If any )

    Thanks





    hair Image: People of Walmart part people of walmart. Enjoy People of Walmart:
  • Enjoy People of Walmart:



  • shukla77
    03-09 12:23 PM
    Where is the great predictor :D



    more...


    people of walmart. People of Walmart.
  • People of Walmart.



  • seeker999
    08-12 09:36 AM
    I like the idea of separate fund for EB3.
    Is there no one in IV admins /founders who are interested in EB3?

    I believe we need to have a EB3 wing in IV ,Ideally the max donors in EB3 ( atleast 10) can be the decision makers and can ensure EB3 voice is also heard.

    We should have the % board members in IV from EB3 wing reflecting the amounts donated by EB3.

    Looks like we already have Patton Boggs lobbying for IV. Did any EB3 candidate ever given an chance to interact with them. Exactly how does this work ?
    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=48

    I feel that if given a chance to talk to Patton Boggs and present our views. There can be huge amounts of funds that can be raised.





    hot People of Walmart people of walmart. People of Walmart. dino.jpg
  • People of Walmart. dino.jpg



  • ajay
    04-13 10:12 AM
    A very useful piece of information has been brought to our attention by shiankuraaf.
    Thank you very much!

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/LPR08.shtm

    Table 6 Persons Obtaining Legal Permanent Resident Status by Type and Major Class of Admission: Fiscal Years 1999 to 2008

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/YrBk04Im.shtm
    Table 4 Immigrants admitted by type and selected class of admission: fiscal years 1986-2004

    Employment-based preferences (Total Number)

    Year QUOTA ISSUED Unused/Excessively used
    1986 140000 56617 83383
    1987 140000 57519 82481
    1988 140000 58727 81273
    1989 140000 57741 82259
    1990 140000 58192 81808
    1991 140000 59525 80475
    1992 140000 116198 23802
    1993 140000 147012 -7012
    1994 140000 123291 16709
    1995 140000 85336 54664
    1996 140000 117499 22501
    1997 140000 90607 49393
    1998 140000 77517 62483
    1999 140000 56678 83322
    2000 140000 106642 33358
    2001 140000 178702 -38702
    2002 140000 173814 -33814
    2003 140000 81727 58273
    2004 140000 155330 -15330
    2005 140000 246877 -106877
    2006 140000 159081 -19081
    2007 140000 162176 -22176
    2008 140000 166511 -26511

    Sum total of the differences from 1986 to 2008: 626,681. Vow!!!

    So when looked between the period of 1986 and 2008,
    there were a total of 626,681 un-used visa numbers that can be re-captured.

    This is based on the BIG assumption that the yearly quota for EB categories is 140,000 from 1986 to 2008.
    Does anybody know how to verify this important assumption online --a link to a gov website perhaps?

    It would be good to verify when the law specifying 140,000 visa numbers per year was passed and
    what were the criteria for visa number usage prior to the existence of the law.
    It is clearly a well prepared format and nobody has brought this kind of helpful information to our group. We would need people like you and I am sure I will also support this if we are aggressively pursuing it. But again as somebody here said in this discussion that we should be careful about the seriousness of the situation being counted by the lawmakers.
    Kudos to you.



    more...


    house Random+people+at+walmart people of walmart. People of Walmart RAP from
  • People of Walmart RAP from



  • GW02
    02-26 12:42 AM
    I swear by Cinema4D, but I don't want to lead teh topic even further off-track.





    tattoo People of Walmart – Part 1 people of walmart. People of Walmart
  • People of Walmart



  • Caliber
    01-16 07:37 PM
    Date of sign up: Jan. 16, 2007
    Subscription Name: Secure $50 Per Month Recurring Contribution Subscription Number: S-09A85447SH728390F

    Contributed till now: 300 + 50 = 350

    Even my October 2002, NJ EB3 labor was not yet approved. Not that some thing good will happen soon, but by seeing the selfless efforts of the core team especially Aman, I feel sad and hence contributing. I know if some one asks me to spend even one hour time for some social life, I may not do so. But this core team has been tirelessly working and I feel ashamed of myself.

    This 485 eligibility to apply will not even benefit me as my labor is stuck with PBEC and I hope all the people waiting with 140 approvals will get benefit.

    Thank you Team IV.



    more...


    pictures funny people of walmart. people of walmart. Weird People From Walmart
  • Weird People From Walmart



  • EdenMN
    07-13 09:06 AM
    I think we should not care 'Is Murthy doing for her publicity / money?' as long as it serves our purpose. We should respect people who are trying to help us . and many folks are blaming she is money minded.... but u know what she runs law firm not non-profitable organization.
    In Iv many people are free riders when they can't contribute money to solve their problem why you guys expect Murthy to do charity work ....





    dresses People of Walmart. dino.jpg people of walmart. The People of Walmart
  • The People of Walmart



  • grinch
    02-27 11:17 AM
    eilsoe,
    I'm wondering how you made that curved bench. My bench, is just like straight, like most are, but did you manually adjust the cv's into a curve, or is their a technique?
    If you could explain, it'd help alot.


    And could you guys reccomend some good (free) texture websites?



    more...


    makeup People of Walmart website, people of walmart. Random+people+at+walmart
  • Random+people+at+walmart



  • mallu
    04-24 09:34 PM
    Hi

    After long haul of almost 5 years , today I got the approval email for my 485 filed in June - 2007.I guess my wife's case should be approved soon.Last when spoke to TCS IO , I was told that biometrics is needed in my case but still they can approve & later send me the notice. I guess only after that I might get the physical card.

    Had anyone experienced this scenario ?
    Anyways I want to thank everyone on this forum,immigration portals, folks & every other support that I have got in this long process.

    I will always be there for everyone on this forum or in any other way I can help to every legal immigrant who is waiting for the Green Card.

    Thanks a lot

    Priority date - 05/2003
    140 approved - 10/2006 from TSC
    485,131,765 RD-6/04/2007 at TSC, notices received - 06/07/2007
    CA, EB2
    Wife's case returned due to some error,send it again & received on 06/17/2007 as per Fedex
    Wife's case RD- 7/10/2007
    I131,I765 approved for both -Nov 2007
    I485 approval mail - 04/24/08 - Myself
    Waiting for spouse approval, physical Cards

    Congrats ! Good to know that TSC is picking up India EB2 cases for approval ( whatever be the random order they have ).





    girlfriend People of Walmart people of walmart. People in Walmart inspire a
  • People in Walmart inspire a



  • ras
    07-12 11:38 AM
    am still unclear. Does it mean those who have PD prior to Jun 06 will get their GC? I cant believe it.

    At the personal end, I have my GC filed with Dec 06 PD. However, I have a previous I140 approved with Sept 05. I was thinking about porting the priority date. If I port it now will I get my GC based on the previous priority date?

    Ofcourse I dont intend to port it at this point of time because am planning to get married in another 3-4months. so can you guys let me know what would be the best approach. Is it porting the previous priority date now or wait till getting married and then port it? In such case will the spouse be eligible to file for 485 when it is current. am confused.





    hairstyles People of Walmart. people of walmart. funny people of walmart
  • funny people of walmart



  • lvinaykumar
    07-16 07:40 PM
    Can we sue them for spreading false information





    sledge_hammer
    02-14 12:49 PM
    To answer your question, no, I'm not a conservative Christian. I'm a Hindu and I'm proud of it!

    Now that I have answered your question, allow me ask YOU a few questions:

    1. If I really were a Conservative Christian, does my belief that Jew were persecuted hold any less credibility?
    2. Are you an anti semite?
    3. Are you friends with Ahmedenejad?
    4. Do you watch a lot of Mel Gibson movies when you're not otherwise writing nonsense on this forum? :)

    Are you a jew or are you asking this because you are a conservative Christan and you believe that jews are special because Christ was jew at the time of birth? Not that there is anything wrong with either, but I just wanted to know.

    "What I believe" - What difference does it make? Why do you ask? You see its a matter of perspective. Someone may feel extremely miserable going through the process and its possible that that person may chose to compare this experience with the real victims of ethnic cleansing. Just because there is no violence involved, it doesn't mean that things cannot be comparable. Mental agony and silent torture in even worst when compared with physical violence because one is dying every moment you live. You may argue that we are all dying every moment we live, then isn't life just a torture?

    Its not necessary that others MUST believe or experience their life the way you or I do. Everybody lives through a different experience. You may not agree with their version or their perspective, but it is not reasonable to force someone to draw comparison based on what you believe. And this is what I believe.

    .





    Macaca
    06-11 02:46 PM
    By having the GC, you are not an American.

    If you do not know the rule here it is, GC is a "Privilege", and it is not a "Right".

    Who made this rule? White trash Matloff? or Slumdog Hira?

    Guess what? Here is a new rule.

    All US born D-O-N-K-E-Y-S - like you - holed up in Guild, WashTech, Bright Future Jobs, NumbersUSA, ... will be dumped in FATA, Pakistan.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment